- Beyond Sustainability - The Case for Regenerative Design
- Understanding Place - Climate, Site, and Solar Geometry
- The Six Integrated Systems - An Overview
- Building with the Earth—Natural Materials
- Passive Solar Design - Heating and Cooling Without Machines
- Off-Grid Energy Systems - Power from the Sun
- Water - Catching, Storing, and Cycling
- Liquid Waste Treatment - Botanical Systems
- Food Systems—Buildings That Feed
- Community Design - Scaling Up
- The Integrated Design Process
- Appendix A: Glossary of Key Terms
- Appendix B: The Pangea Textbook Series
- Appendix C: Key Design Principles at a Glance
- The Regenerative Community Vision
- Site Assessment and Land Reading
- Land Use Law and Legal Frameworks
- Master Planning for Regenerative Communities
- Infrastructure Systems Integration
- Housing Typologies and Density Design
- Community Governance Structures
- Economic Models for Community Development
- Phased Development Strategy
- Community Resilience and Long-Term Stewardship
- Appendix A: Legal Entity Comparison Chart
- Appendix B: Community Design Checklist
- Appendix C: Glossary of Community Development Terms
Sociocracy (also called dynamic governance or circular organization) is a governance system designed to balance efficiency and equity in group decision-making. It has been adopted by many cohousing and intentional communities as an alternative to both top-down management and slow consensus processes.
The key innovations of sociocracy include: governance by circles (semi-autonomous teams responsible for specific domains), double-linking between circles (two-way information and accountability flow), consent-based decision-making (decisions are accepted when no one has a principled objection, without requiring enthusiasm from all), and role-based leadership (specific roles with defined domains of authority elected by the circle).
Sociocracy is not a panacea but it provides useful structures for communities that want more efficiency than pure consensus without reverting to top-down authority. Many communities use a hybrid approach: sociocratic structure for operational domains with full consensus for major community-wide decisions.
